Our Group; Perception wanted to focus more on the space itself and how the artwork was attracting and enhancing the visitor’s experience. We originally wanted to convey the emotions we felt when visiting the gallery but found with only the five of us that it was hard to get a broad collection of data on different emotions. We then thought that another way to encapsulate the essence of the space was to focus on the senses that the installations activated; sight, touch, sound, taste, smell, vestibular sensation (balance) and proprioception (movement).
We visited the gallery as a group to discuss how we could manage the task and the best way to break it down to collect our data. We then went back individually to take in the installations and record what senses they activated in a data table. We chose a select group of works, installations, video works and sculptures as we felt they were the most engaging with more senses in an objective way, whereas paintings would just engage objectively sight.
We decided cellophane would be an effective way to display our data as the coloured layers represented the overlapping of the senses and how the experience was heightened when multiple senses were engaged. We presented the data in order as though you are moving through the exhibition in order to create a sensory map.
Our data showed that sight was evident in all of the installations whereas smell was only evident in one. If we were to collect the data differently we would effectively take more notice of the installations blended in with the environment. For example, the café and children’s area were both later established as installations, but as it was in an open area we came to the conclusion it wasn’t a part of the gallery.