TV Cultures Blog Post 3

True Detective and Anthology series.

True Detective is a HBO crime drama series revolving around the solving of murders and mysteries in a serial lasting 8 episodes. Unlike other complex narrative programs such as The Soprano’s or Breaking Bad, True Detective is an anthology series, and while each individual episode is tightly connected to the ones that precede and follow it, the seasons themselves are only tangibly connected under name and  general subject matter.

The anthology format has multiple benefits and downsides compared to the continuous, long running style of a traditional narrative-based television show. One such benefit is the ability to cast actors in pivotal roles, who may not want to be a part of multi-year contract, instead doing a small number of episodes without worrying about possible scheduling issues that came arrise years into the future. Without its anthology format, True Detective would not have been able to cast “movie stars”, such as McConahugey and Harrelson “who wouldn’t commit to an ongoing series” (Wienman, 2015). The anthology format also allows the show to keep fresh, and avoid drawn, pointless or repeated story aspects that can negatively affect long-running complex narrative shows such as Breaking Bad (Wienman, 2015). “Tv writers are better at crafting beginnings than middles or endings”…”and the seasonal anthology is 90% beginnings” (Wienman, 2015).

However, this constant revival and change has some negative aspects as well, if a show changes from one season to another, the audience may not enjoy the next season of the show, and without continuing story archs from the season that they did, have little reason to watch.

The first season of True Detective which aired in 2014, starred Matthew McConahugey and Woody Harrelson playing Louisiana Detectives Rustin Cohle and Martin Hart, unlike a traditional television series, after the 8 episode season was complete, the next season did not continue to follow the antics of Rust and Marty. Instead it followed an entire new cast of characters, in a different location and was stylistically different to the first season. The second season of True Detective now starred Colin Farrel and Vince Vaughn, and was stylistically different from the first season. The show no-longer switched between varying time periods, and the music choices being vastly different in terms of genre and tone.

The second season of True Detective was much maligned by fans, and received far less critical praise than the first. These screenshots from Metacritic.com show that season 1 was rated on average 87/100 by professional critics, and had an average public user rating of 9.2/10.

 

Meanwhile, season 2 received an average rating of 61/100 from critics and 6.4/10 from users.

This disappointment from fans and drop in perceived quality is the result of True Detective changing from its first season, but it cannot be treated as a new or unique show because of the series label, meaning that it will always be compared to the first season. A common complaint about True Detectives second season is that it is trying (and in the eyes of many) failing to “summon the spirit of the first season”, but somehow lacking the “rare alchemy of factors” that made the first season so well received and that Season 2 “is not the same” (Goodman, 2015, pp.84).

This is the result of the debacle which plagues all entertainment mediums, not just TV. If a follow-up to something is too similar, it will feel stale and likely not capture the sense of originality of its predecessor, but if a sequel/second season/follow-up is too different people will complain that it lost what made the original appealing.

As a seasonal anthology, True Detective is not immune to these criticisms, but its format does allow more flexibility. As if one season is disappointing, it doesn’t necessarily affect future seasons because it can start anew, without having to continue anything that was not received well.

References

Goodman, T. 2015, “Season two of HBO’s anthology crime series, now starring Colin Farrel, Rachel McAdams and Vince Vaughn, seems to be suffering from try-hard syndrome” Hollywood Reporter, vol. 421(21)  pp. 84
“True Detective: Season 1”, Metacritic < http://www.metacritic.com/tv/true-detective > [Accessed on 26/10/15]
“True Detective: Season 2”, Metacritic < http://www.metacritic.com/tv/true-detective/season-2 > [Accessed on 26/10/15]
Weinman, J. 2015, “Now for something completely different”, Rogers Publishing Limited, Toronto.

On the Frame: Final Project – Behind the Scenes: HeadSplosion, from concept to reality

Here is a ‘behind the scenes’ video for my final project.

Behind the Scenes – Headsplosion, from concept to reality from Sandy Jones on Vimeo.

I wanted to emulate the style found on DVD extras, where a director talks the audiance through an important or technically challanging sequence of the film, giving a broader understanding of how films are made to the public.

I dressed like that because I could.

On the Frame: Week 12 – Mad Max: Fury Road and the pub

This was the final week of classes for “On the Frame”, and it was probably the best week because we got to watch

Fury Road title sequence

I love this film, its my favourite film to come out in years, and will likely hold a spot on my personal list of films I will rewatch endlessly for a VERY long time. I adore everyting about this movie, and after seeing it more times than I’d like to admit (six?, seven maybe) the sound of the engine starting up as the Warner Brothers logo appears gets me pumped everytime.

The rest of this blog post will be me typographly shouting things I loved about the movie.

 

THE ACTION, ALL OF IT. ITS ALL SO GOOD!!!!!! The Buzzard’s attacking the war rig, the the cayon chase, the Pole Cats. I LOVE IT ALL.

mediocre

 

THE CHARACTER AND WORLD DESIGN, AAAAARG ITS BEUTIFUL. Immortan Joe’s cancer’y, torso, the lumps and bumps that are all over the War Boys, the People Eater driving a bastardised limo to fit with his Business-man attire and penny-counting attitude, the little notch on the War Rig’s steering wheel for Furiosa’s prosthetic hand to grip on, AND THE COMA DOOF WARRIOR, everything about him.

Coma Doof Warrior

THE LORE AND ALL THAT IT IMPLIES! “half-life War Boys” are all sick from radiation, trained and conditioned to die gloriously in battle because otherwise they would die from cancererous lumps anyway. “Shiny and Chrome” they worship vechilles, and the best vechiles are shiny and chrome, so they huff Chrome Paint before dying to prepare them selves for Valhalla, also “Chroming” is an actual thing where people huff paint to get high, which would make it easier to suicide bomb for the glory of the Immortan. “SING BROTHER KOCH” when the Bullet Farmer gets blinded and goes (even morso) insane he yells for his brothers to SIIIIIIIIING, including a ‘brother Koch” which is a reference to Heckler and Koch a company that made the guns he was using at the time, and would have had the name written on the side.

Sing brothers SIIIIIIIIIIIIIING

 

And litteraly everything else about this movie, I LOVE IT SO MUCH.

 

Then on thursday we briefly talked about the movie, then went to the pub, which was a fantastic end to a fantastic semester of classes.

Thanks Dan.

On the Frame: Final Project – Reflecting on first day of shooting (Part 1)

On the 1st of October I was absent from class, but I was however working very hard on my Final Project for the semester.

The previous evening I caught the train back to my hometown of Yackandandah in North East Victoria, the following morning I began shooting my short film. The process was rather rushed and unproffesional, but it all worked out in the end. Two of my actors were only avalible for one day (Nathan who played the President was only avalible for about 2-3 hours), this meant that everything had to be done as fast as possible, I had Kaddy (my other friend, who was avalible for one day only) assisting with filming, as well as recording “behind the scenes” footage on my phone. Nathan’s sister Emma even helped, and had a cameo role as Doloros, the secretary.

Photo from set

Before the day of filming I wasnt exactly sure how many people I would have to work with, although my “script” allowed for this, so many of the lines and especially costumes and sets were created as we were working. Filming was done on my dads digital camera which was of quite reasonable quality, the morning was dedicated to all the scenes Nathan was involved in, which happened to be a scene at the beginning, middle and end of the film. They were relativly simple scenes, but I was delibratly choosing shots and movements which I would be able to manipulate in editing for stylistic effect, including frame-rate alterations, freeze-frames and rapid quick cuts with a “WHOOSH” sound effect.

After saying goodbye to Nathan and wishing him a happy overseas trip (as I said, we had to get this done quick), I began to start work on the rest of the film. We were joined by my cousin Josh, who with me and Kaddy was playing one of the three main cast. After ruffling through my wardrobe to find a suitible costume (a purple shirt, eye-patch and mini top hat) we were ready to film. At first it was some very simple shots of characters silently listening to a phonecall (which was already recorded), we then headed of to the bush.

It was here where some more shots were done that I planned this entire film (and frame-rating experimenting) around: the driving scene.

Each character was going to be given a freeze-frame introduction, and Kaddy’s character “Black Hat” was always seen with his car, which made it the perfect time to get mutliple shots of moving vechiles. Inspired by Drive, Mad Max (both Road Warrior and Fury Road) I wanted 3 different types of shots.

The first being a shot from inside the car, watching it move forwards (the type of shot that was very common in Drive). Due to it being a very small area, and not exactly being stunt-men, we could only drive very slowly. However this worked to the advantage of my project, as I wanted to speed it up artifically in editing, and see how far I could push it before it looked terrible. I was inspired by The Road Warrior which used this exact technique for the same reasons, and Fury Road, which used similar manipulation more for stylistic effect.

Car POV shot

 

The second type of shot I wanted was of the driver’s (Black Hat AKA Kaddy) face while driving, which proved to be difficult to shoot, since driving with a camera pointed at your face is rather challanging. This shot is where the freeze-frame and character intro was going to be, so I needed a good shot of his face and costume. I also wanted to continue the speed editing, to make it seem like he was driving more than 10km/h.

 

Car Face shot

 

The final car shot I wanted to get was a stationary camera looking at a moving vechile, which established the location more-so than the limited view the previous shots gave. Again I wanted to experiment with just how far I could speed it up, without it looking terrible.

On the Frame: Final Project – First Balloon Test

For my initial test footage for my Final Project, I wanted to see if my idea for using a Water balloon for a substitute for an exploding head would work.

This video is my first ever test of using an iPhones slow-mo camera to shoot the explosion of water.

I was very happy with how it turned out, and I saw that I would be able to make it look very good.

On the Frame Blog: Week 11 – More planning on final Presentation and updating the Class on Project Brief 4

In this week’s classes we continued planning the End of Semester presentation about the studio, and corrolating all our answers into a Google Doc, so that the speakers can give answers that represent the whole class and not just themselves. Having a look at other peoples answers, something statements are very common and appear again and again only worded slightly differently. Common recurring themes were the freedom of choice in the final assignment, as well as appricating the massive variety in films we watched and different ways of analysing the frame.

On thursday’s class we all had to give an update on how our major project is going, and show some footage if we had it avalible. It was interesting to see so many people’s projects change direction since the proposal presentations. Most people had some kind of footage to show, and it was very interesting seeing how peoples ideas were coming to frutition.

My “update” came in the form of reassuring the class that everything was going more-or-less to plan, and that I had completed all my filming on schedule over the long weekend. I showed two sections of footage, the first was a compolation of all my “Slo-Motion Exploding Balloons” which I filmed many, MANY times experimenting with different techniques and trying to perfectly replicate a cheesy “Head-splosion” effect.

My second segment was something, that in retro-spect was probably a waste of time but it was fun anyway, was a approx 1 minute “trailer” for my film. I wanted to make something tounge-in-cheek and make it look like my film was serious and important. It was harder than I though, and i probably spent at least 2-3 hours putting it together. I wanted to make it as “Hollywood” as possible, with dramatic phrases over the top of unrelated footage (as in stuff from another part of the film), I found some cheesy “Duh DUN” sound effects to puncuate my  cuts to classic trailer phrases such as “This October…..”. Im also pretty proud of the ending to my trailer, which has the segment preceeding the Exploding head, including pulling a gun up to someones forehead and pulling the trigger. Instead of showing the explosion, i just played as gunshot sound-effect and cut to black for 4 seconds, which was fairly “proffesional” looking, if I do say so myself.

Again, it was probably a waste of time, but It was fun.

On the Frame Blog: Week 10 – Final Presentation and Questions about the Studio

In this weeks class we talked about how we are going to deal with the final 8 minute studio presentation, we quickly agreed that it would be best to only have a few people speak as to not clutter everything up and go massivly overtime, so everyone in the studio has to be a part of writing the things that these designated speakers will say.

To get a start on this we all answered 3 questions.

What is the Studio investigating/exploring. How is it doing this.

The studio looked at the Frame, and all the various aspects of how it influences cinema as well as other mediums. One of the first things we did was the “gallery ramble” in which we looked at various paintings in the National Gallery of Victoria and identified aspects such as colour, size, shape etc… as well as thier actual physical frames and where they were placed in the gallery, and how all of this affects our viewing of the artwork, which was a precursor to applying these thoughts to film.

Throughout the semester we watched many films, from across many genres and decades, each looking at different ways film-makers have used the frame to produce thier work. We looked at French new wave, Noir, High Concept, mobile cinema as well as a plethora of readings by various film theorists on how the many ways film can be read and made.

 

What did YOU discover in terms of your current/future proffesional practice.

Througout this semester I discovered lots about film production and theory that will, and already has, help my potential film making career. I learned lots about practical methods of doing filmmaking, such as 180 degree rule, shot-reverse-shot, using colour, movement and other visual aspects to aid in creating the narrative (these were all concepts I knew of, but the studio greatly enhanced by knowledge and understanding).

The final project, in which I directed a 5 minute film, was a great practical experience that both put all the theory into reality but also was a foray into other challanges of filmaming. Things like managing conflicting schedules (one of my actors who was in the beginning, middle and ending only had 4 hours of avalibility over the weekend of filming befoore leaving for Europe), as well as putting concepts into reality with a very limited budget, many concessions from my original storyboards had to be abandonned because I didnt have the equipment, manpower or time.

All of this is just as, if not more, valuable to real-life professional filmmaking than any theory.

 

What about the Studio would you recommend to potential future students?

I would suggest this studio to students who want to both learn and study film as well as engage in practical work, if they want to do nothing but learn how to and participate in making film another studio is probably better for them. However this studio was great in studying film and looking intensly at how and why other people did certain things when making films, as well as different techniques and methods which came about over the history of film.

I would recommend this studio to students who love film and want to learn more about it, and with assignments that are very open-ended to suit basically any appraoch.