Integrating Theory and Practice: Editing

For this weeks exploration, I decided to focus on the guest lecture from Liam Ward. Editing is the practice of “deliberately breaking things [in order to]… fill the gaps with meaning” (Ward, 2015).

The most famous breakthrough in the field of editing was through experiments by Lev Kuleshov, a Russian Filmmaker and theorist living in Moscow in the 1920’s. Through his experiments, the best known of which involved re-editing footage of “the expressionless face of actor Ivan Mozzhukhin… alternated with shots of a plate of soup, a young woman, and a little girl in a coffin.” People who took part in this experiment stated that they appreciated “Mozzhukhin’s ability to convey the emotions of hunger, desire, and grief respectively.” Despite the fact that he was expressing the exact same emotion each time:

Such experiments helped Kuleshov to develop his theory of the Kuleshov effect, “The proposition that the meaning of any given film will derive from the juxtaposition of individual shots as a result of the editing process… [and that] audiences understand the meaning of images differently depending on their sequential arrangement.” (Kuhn and Westwell, 2014).

One of the most effective editing techniques is match cutting. A match cut relies on something within one shot directly relating to something within the next shot, leading our brains to automatically create a link between the two. This is mainly done through matching shapes, colours, movement and even the overall composition of a shot. Basically, anything graphically. One of the most prolific and amazing uses of this technique is a Japanese animator by the name of Satoshi Kon, who I actually found out about from one of Aidan Tai Jones’ blog posts. This video essay by Tony Zhou shows just how prolific Kon’s use of this technique is, and how his use has changed the way many other director’s use match cuts and other editing techniques, as is seen through his influence on many other artist’s work:

Match cuts are unfortunately not used very often in mainstream films, but are however very prominent in experimental films and some particular directors, such as Edgar Wright, have adopted the match cut as a part of their signature style.

Another commonly used technique is elliptical editing. Elliptical editing is used throughout most films as it is very rare for a film to take place in ‘real time’. Elliptical editing is a technique used to shorten the length of sequences by removing unnecessary details to the overall story and plot development, such as when characters eat or use the bathroom, pick up objects out of frame and then put them on, or walk up a really tall mountain. By seeing pieces of these sequences our brains automatically piece together what has occurred, creating the important links needed in the narrative. This example from “Batman Begins” (Nolan, 2005) shows this technique:

One technique that often goes unnoticed but for some reason seems a bit strange to the human eye is rear projection, a technique commonly used for driving scenes due to the difficulty of filming subjects in a car from multiple angles while the car is in motion, mainly used in low-budget film-making, TV shows and films throughout the 20’s through to the 60’s. Rear projection works by placing your subjects in front of a screen, which you then project previously recorded footage onto, to give the illusion of motion. Add sound effects and it almost seems realistic. However some silent films in the 1920’s used this technique for different purposes, to create entire worlds of delusion and daydream for their characters, such as in “Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans” (Murnau, 1927):

From 2:29-3:11, Murnau uses rear projection to give us the idea that the Man and the Wife are so enamored with each other that they are separate from reality and so walk into their own. Also, because rear projection is used, it adds to the idea that their environment is disconnected from them somehow as it moves in a different way to the couple.

These are only three techniques that are commonly used in the practice of editing, there are many more to describe and many more, I’m sure, left to discover.

– Ward, Liam. Lectorial Guest Lecture on Editing-24/3/2015

– Kuhn, Annette and Guy Westwell. “A Dictionary of Film Studies.” Entry: “Kuleshov Effect.” Oxford University Press, 2014

The World is Random, So Why not Create a Meaning for it all

Adrian Miles seems to be one of the most provocative and intriguing people you will ever meet, especially while at uni. He was a guest lecturer in today’s lectorial and he told us all, all of us with our young, absorbent, spongy brains, how stories are something that are uniquely human, and how we constantly search for the meaning of things, as opposed to seeing what things actually are.

He told us many things. How we’ve been taught to believe that thinking is privileged, so if you think of something you’ve basically done it already. That we think we’re on top of the food chain, when that is simply preposterous. How we have this notion of “I think, therefore I am”, so we separate our brains from our bodies, when in reality they are in concert with each other, they are one and the same. All this and more he told us, and it was the most provocative talk you will ever hear, because you sit there and listen and you think ‘but that’s not right’, and then you sit there some more and realise, ‘but wait, it is right’. And then you do something amazing, that was the whole point of him talking in front of you in the first place, you start to think about it in your own way and start to contribute unique thoughts to the conversation as you realise that the world is not the size of the fish pond it was back in high school. It’s an ocean of possibility (as you can see, still working on the originality part).

After Adrian spoke to us about meaning and how it’s all in our heads, Liam Ward spoke to us about editing. This was very interesting to me, as I find I struggle to consistently edit with meaning and purpose. Liam told us about how the human brain creates meaning when there’s a sudden cut from one shot to another, using that one shot from “2001: A Space Odyssey” (Kubrick, 1968) that everyone uses (but is still a brilliant example):

Liam started his talk by saying that editing is “deliberately breaking and fragmenting things”, allowing us to fill the gaps with meaning and ask why these gaps exist in the first place.

Liam showed us the Kuleshov effect:

This emphasises that we discern the meaning of one image from the images surrounding it, not just the image itself. Liam emphasised this point by showing us all a photo of Joffrey Baratheon from the “Game of Thrones” (Benioff and Weiss, 2011-):

 

Joffrey

 

And then placing it next to photos of Christopher Pine:

chris pine bad 3

 

And then this photo next to the photo of Joffrey:

chris pine bad 2

 

By placing each of these photos of Christopher Pine next to Joffrey, (yes we all did laugh a lot) it produces a link between the boy king and the politician, as it shows them both with a similar pose, gesture and facial expression, and then it removes that link by showing that Pine doesn’t approve of Joffrey, for whatever reason (probably the same reason as the rest of us). These links also produce emotional reactions in the audience. If your audience is a bunch of uni students, who are probably leaning towards the left politically, finding out that Christopher Pine disapproves of Joffrey like we do, probably produces a reaction somewhere along the lines of unsettling, as even people who are more right wing politically disapprove of Joffrey, emphasising how horrific a ruler he is in the world of “Game of Thrones” (2011-).

– Benioff, David and D.B. Weiss. “Game of Thrones.” 2011- Present

Less is More can be a Hard Lesson

Today we looked at editing and I honestly found myself stuck in that annoying hole that I often find myself in of using more rather than less, as I tried to create a montage of images (as I weirdly enjoy the use of montage theory and alienating people), but the more images I used, the more I found that they started to loose meaning and just simply became dizzying.

Luckily Robbie was there otherwise I would have dug myself a very deep hole in the quantity rather than quality category. After chatting with Robbie I realised the need to dissect my content and really play with ideas and meanings.

I hope my parents are ready, because they’re about to become my guinea pigs.

Pushing Boundaries: Entering Other Worlds – The world of Audio Documentary

For this weeks exploration I decided to explore the audio documentary. Since Kyla Brettle showed us some examples of her work in our lectorial this week, I found it very interesting how much more powerful it was to just listen to the content and imagine the situation, rather than both see and hear it simultaneously. I saw the power of audio, as it allows the audience to really, truly create the links in their head, they aren’t as guided by the director and are more free to make up their own mind.

The first audio documentary was simply anthropological observations ad historical recordings of daily life and civilisations, much like the “first films shot by Edison and the Lumière brothers — no edits or narration or stories.” (Carrier, 2014) The first incident of this was in 1890, when “an anthropologist named Jesse Walter Fewkes used a phonograph to record the songs and speech of the Passamaquoddy Indians of eastern Maine. For many decades this was the extent of audio documentary — recording oral history and music.” (Carrier, 2014)

Some examples from 1890 (Carrier, 2014):

Snake Dance:

Mr. Phonograph:

Kyla Brettle is a prolific producer of audio documentaries, such as ‘Trauma’ which, “In a kaleidoscopic style shifting between observational and experiential forms of documentary, Mark Fitzgerald, the Director of Emergency Services takes us into the heart of his department – a place where dramatic, life-changing events occur with relentless regularity against a background of routine order. As staff and patients share their experiences of either unexpectedly arriving at the hospital or coming home from it every day, documentary maker Kyla Brettle seeks to discover what place the big questions about life, society and human nature have in an environment that by definition strives to maintain the mechanics of life from one moment to the next.” (ABC, 2013)

“Why radio? Why documentary? Answer: No other medium can provide me with more freedom of creation and investigation. It meets my urgent interest in reality and the desire for a ‘musical’ expression. The material (der Werkstoff) is sound. And sound always surrounds us. And: I’m not so much interested in the description of stable situations, but in processes. Our medium is not space, but time; our stories are not glued to the ground, but have motion, life … That’s why!” – Helmut Kopetzky, German author, Self-portrait

 – Carrier, Scott. ” A Brief History of Documentary Forms. 6. NPR & Radio Docs.” Apr. 3rd 2014. Available at: http://transom.org/2014/brief-history-of-documentary-forms/
 – ABC. “Trauma.” Oct. 20th 2013. Available at: http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/sundayfeature/trauma/5032004

Pushing Boundaries: Entering Other Worlds

Today in our lectorial we had 2 guest lecturers, Anne Lennox and Kyla Brettle.

Anne came to talk to us, in brief about copyright in Australia and other countries. It was interesting to find out how our work is automatically protected here in Australia, but in America, there are unfortunately a large number of hoops to go through before a work can be copyrighted. Listening to Anne gave me a much greater appreciation for Australian legislation (in some areas) and allowed me to understand the impact copyright can have on my work. I found it interesting that under ‘fair dealing’, it’s ok to use copyrighted work so long as it’s for research and study, criticism and review, reporting news, and parody and satire.

Kyla came to talk to us about her experiences in the industry, which seem to have evolved through non-fiction, going from documentary film, to radio documentary, and various forms of journalism in between. I found it very interesting listening to Kyla talk about all of her amazing experiences, which never would have happened, had she not decided to poke at the boundaries she saw herself within. Not just the amazing people and situations she told us about constantly observing, but also the courage to transition from the widely used and distributed medium of the film documentary to the radio documentary, a lesser known, yet equally, if not more powerful medium. Listening to examples of Kyla’s work was quite amazing, as I found it even more overpowering than a film documentary, as the imagery is left entirely up to you and your own mind, your own relative experiences, to fill the gaps, allowing a strangely personal bond to occur.

Kyla talked about how difficult and worthwhile it is to stretch yourself and get out of your comfort zone and how rewarding it can be to see things unfold that you normally would never experience on a purely observational level. She spoke about how difficult it was for her to do these things but how worthwhile it was in the long run and all the amazing things she’s been able to do throughout her career.

I feel like I myself am at a stage where I could go the path that Kyla has, pushing not just the social boundaries of our society through her observations, but pushing the boundaries within herself. Or I could go the other way and choose to take no physical action, instead staying in the artificial world known as the internet. I feel as though I am at a turning point. And what better place to turn around and change then at university. And hey, why not blog about it too.

 

Self Portrait Reveals

Today we revealed our self portraits and explained why we chose to create those products, as well as gave feedback to all the other people in our little groups of five as through the use of four of the De Bono six thinking hats. Either the ‘positive’ yellow hat, ‘gut reaction’ red hat, ‘there’s something wrong here’ black hat, or ‘oooh! Now do this!’ green hat.

six thinking hats

It was surprisingly comforting having all these creative minds appreciate and accept my work and give me advice and ideas and inspiration. I was so anxious for no apparent reason and it felt so good to just de-stigmatize so many things for myself through photos and film and audio. I can’t wait to try and create a one minute fluid sequence with new, fresh ideas, footage and images as well as some old ones from this project.

Self Portrait: Naive and I know it

For Media 1, for our first assignment, we had to create a self portrait of ourselves. So, this is what I thought of myself when I started Uni;

 

Bird Cage

 

Through this image I wanted to convey the way I felt throughout high school, and in a way, still feel now as I learn to adjust and settle into the style of university life.

This is not Alaine

 

This is an homage to Rene Magritte’s ‘The Treachery of Images”. I wanted to show that this self portrait is only a representation of myself and not actually me.

My View

 

Through this filter I aimed to show my unique and whimsical view of the world.

Tree

A while ago I had surgery on my back and in order to de-stigmatize it for myself and give it a new kind of beauty, I decided to get my dad to paint a tree around it, to show growth and strength.

This is a recording of my favourite place to just relax.

This is a recording of me singing “Singin’ in the Rain”, as I feel this song best shows my positive attitude towards life in general.

‘I’m naive. But I embrace my naivety. “So it goes” – Kurt Vonnegut Jr. Slaughterhouse 5’

I chose these words to somehow sum up myself, because I found this so hard to do and wound up writing in circles, until I finally decided to go with something simple. But how do you sum up one person in 50 words, let alone 10, 000 words? not even a film could achieve such a feat.

Through this video I wanted people to feel the way I feel when I walk my dogs, which for me is having gorgeous furballs constantly smile at you, and feeling the sunshine as I walk through along this path. Hence, why it’s called sunshine in a lense, an inherently Australian thing to capture.

This, for me, was yet another way to de-stigmatize something and show the world how I see things, both literally and metaphorically. I have a condition known as visual snow, which, as you’ll see from the video is like having the static of a TV screen over your vision all the time. I wanted to show that although I may see the world in a literally different way to most people in the world, I really do see the world differently to everyone else. Not because of my condition, but because of me.

John Cage: The Art of Noticing

John Cage was born in late 1912 and died on August 12th, 1992. And yet, his mark still remains on music and art history. Cage challenged the very idea of what constitutes music, playing amplified cacti and plant materials with a feather:

‘Waterwalk’, in which Cage uses a variety of things (mostly containing water and surrounding a piano):

John Cage’s music challenges the very notion of what music is. Just as we as media practitioners must find the malleability within our art form, Cage constantly tests the boundaries of what music is by distilling it down to its purest and most basic forms and then experimenting. By doing this he creates his own ideas about sound and does not rely on the limitations already put in place by musicians before him.

In Cage’s 4’33”, Cage performs, quite literally silence, but as you will notice, silence does not exist, as when a room has no external sounds, we become acutely aware of all the other sounds constantly surrounding us, such as our heartbeats, breathing, coughs, chair squeaks, etc. Any sounds that we’d normally place in the background come forward. I could place a video example here, there are plenty of them on YouTube, examples of people performing nothing, or you could just find a silent spot and sit and listen to the ‘silence’ for 4 minutes and 33 seconds.

The question is though, is this music? Cage is quoted as saying that, “everything we do is music.”, so every sound, every little exclamation or breath we take is music. We just don’t hear it very often because it’s cluttered by all the other sounds we create and subject ourselves to for entertainment. Cage was very interested by the concept, or sounds which silence produced:

John Cage, even though he may be a practitioner of sound, ‘silence’ and music, is vital to study when undertaking any arts related course, because looking at Cage’s work forces you to look differently at a medium you may have unknowingly perceived as being within a strict, stationary box. Whereas Cage’s work, and many other experimentalists like him prove, that there is no limit to what can be achieved with a medium.

Media is Everywhere

Today for our media lectorial we were asked to go out and explore the city and see how much media we could discover. As you could imagine, it was a lot.

DSC_1160 shop fronts and displays

DSC_1170 DSC_1173 shop signs

DSC_1179 DSC_1182 sale signs

DSC_1167 DSC_1165 DSC_1181 posters

DSC_1174 DSC_1188 DSC_1186 DSC_1187 grafitti

DSC_1178 DSC_1168 public notices

DSC_1184 public art/sculpture

DSC_1163 public protest

DSC_1191 buskers

DSC_1159 trams

Of course, there were many more things that I didn’t take photos of, such as my phone (which was taking all the photos), people’s clothes and accessories (yes, you are a walking piece of media, whether you like it or not), sales people, newspaper stands, people’s conversations, music, signs of all kinds, flags, giant billboards, billboards tv screens, lights, etc.

And that was only between LaTrobe and Bourke St…

This only proves how filled our world is with media, and how little control we have over our exposure to it.

 

The Essential Art of Noticing

In our week 2 lectorial Brian Morris talked to us about media itself, and this quote pretty much sums it up, “The media are not so much ‘things’ as places which most of us inhabit, which weave in and out of our lives. Their constant messages and pleasures seem to flow around and through us, and they immerse most of our working lives”. (Morris, 2015)

Brian then went on to talk about texts, “sites where meanings are generated through the manipulation of materials and codes [and] do not simply ‘picture’ or ‘reflect’ a reality where meaning resides.” (Morris, 2015) This means that while media texts do in a way represent our reality, as they are created by an individual, they are therefore influenced by the way that individual percieves the world and thus the text is only a reflection of reality through that individual’s eyes.

Texts also tend omit certain information, as though attempting to persuade opinion or win an argument, as through omitting content in various ways, different effects can be achieved. This idea of omittion brought up another idea, of mediated vs. unmediated communication, as in communication utilising a medium such as books, films, the internet, etc. Unmediated communication, such as face to face interaction has an authenticity and a direct experience associated to it, whereas in modern society where social media communication is predominant, communication is more distant, as in order to communicate we have to go through another conduit to reach the desired person.

Media is everywhere, whether it’s assaulting your senses as you try to read on a Melbourne Central platform, or just sliding past you on your Facebook feed. The trick is noticing the interesting little details that inspire you to create or appeal to your view of the world.

Noticing things is surprisingly difficult. We don’t take in half the things we see as we are “multi-sensate beings, we are inundated with sense impressions all the time.” (Mason, 2002 ) Researching Your Own Practice, The Discipline of Noticing. This makes it increasingly difficult to notice even an instant of a moment and take note of it.

John Cage’s most famous performance emphasises our ability to notice things, as well as how cluttered our lives can get, as in his performance 4’33”, also known as ‘sounds like silence’ he performs nothing, allowing the people in the room to stop and notice the things they normally take for granted, such as breathing or the beating of their heart. He also created an emotional reaction and awareness, as many people panicked at the idea of sitting in a theatre and waiting for something that never happened, allowing people to become more readily aware of their bodies reactions as well.

Do you take the time to notice that the sun is actually shining when you’re having a horrible day? To see the interesting grafitti on the street? To see the birds dance through the shopping centre? Do you notice the life around you, or are you too focused and crowded in your head that you forget that the world is huge and yet small at the same time? These are all questions that are worth thinking about, if you just take time to notice the eccentricities of life.

– Morris, Brian. Lectorial, week 2

– Mason, John. “Researching Your Own Practice. The Discipline of Noticing.” Routledge Falmer, 2002