Polutin the Airwaves

So this year I’ve been part of a couple of crews in preparing and presenting a show for community radio station 3RRR’s Room With A View which plays every Monday at noon. The reason I took radio over TV this year at RMIT was simply because.. well I’m terrible with my social skills. You can probably ask anyone in the class about how I just stay very quiet and keep to myself.. when inside I’m constantly at war with myself trying to talk to anybody at all. Well I swayed over to radio on the basis that I had to work with less people. The first thing I would probably say is that, whilst it was probably not the best reason to pick radio it did pay off the moment we walked into 3rrr made me feel right at home. The first room they got us to sit in just had this giant wall of records on it and I just wanted to sit there and got through them all one by one! Just when I thought I knew a thing or two about music -pfffffffffffttttt-

I was put into the panel position for most of the shows because once again, my social ability -coughdisabilitycough- made me want to veer away from being the presenter, but I knew I had to keep trying if I wanted to break these demnd chains of anxiety. Working at any panel for the first time for most people probably seems like they’re about to get training on how to send the room they’re in to outer space (the looks on their faces is just pure gold) but since I had done some audio work before the panel job didn’t really scare me and I picked it up pretty quickly. That doesn’t mean it was a relaxing time sitting behind that booth! You had to be constantly vigilant and always be making sure something is on air and that your buttons and tracks are working and everything is lined up on cue and that the levels are good and just..yeah. My groupmate Zoe pointed out after her first live show as panel operator that after presenting a show she always felt great but after paneling  it left her felling stressed out till even after the show was done.

My first time going live on air? Holy shit I was terrified! I mean I can’t even stand the sound of my own voice the few times I actually do speak out, now it was being sent out to the general public for an hour? Hahahahahahahahahaha! But it turned out to be a lot more fun than I thought! I actually kinda enjoyed talking to people and asking questions. Maybe the thing I can learn from here to apply to my daily life is to have scripted questions to ask everyone I meet, that way I’ll actually have conversation starters .lol. I kid, I’m not that bad. OK maybe I am.

Doing this show at 3rrr has been really fun I would say compared to making TV shows because it’s more to do with the message. I would definitely like to still work in film related mediums, but for now at least after what I’ve experienced in 3rrr I would love to continue being a part of radio. The only problem for me is I hate ad’s so much I refuse to listen to most radio. I mean I hate them with a dark passion.

 

If I had my own  show !! I have no idea how I’d run it to be honest.. I guess I realize the importance of ads amongst other things and that I could probably endorse things that support my ideals. I’d have to try it to find out but I don’t know the protocol behind running my own radio show. I would guarantee a lot of swearing and arguments which is just the way I like it! And probably what would not let my show stay on air =(

Besides that though I would say the biggest issue was forcing topics out of thin air. I don’t know if I’d run a show where it was necessary to have effectively schizophrenic topics every week that had no connection to anything besides a preferably obscure nature. It’s like we had a direction which was no direction besides what we explicitly couldn’t do. I’m not saying there shouldn’t be shows like it, don’t get me wrong, people need shit to fill up their time when they’re bored and can’t stand the sound of their own thoughts – it’s just not what I would want to do with a radio show.

Apart from my little rant! I loved working in radio and I really hope to be better at talking to people.. I see Australians do it so well and easily and I just don’t know how they do it.. and if I do get better then I can meet awesome people who know awesome things and it could be fun! Or extremely terrifying. I guess we’ll just have to see. Peace!

derp..

I’m having a little difficulty really placing this blog in my life. I’m not really sure what to find appropriate content to put up here. If this should be a place where I document only things from uni and or related to it, or just everything. I think thats why I find myself struggling to post things up. I keep judging myself thinking that content that isn’t related to the course isn’t worthy of being posted here.

Generation of Jesters

So I just finished watching a 4 Corners doco [EDIT: Link works but no video cause they want money for views so don’t bother] on how kids both utilize and are utilized by social media and how the world runs on ‘likes’

Big companies that own these platforms sell the data they collect on user behaviour and sell it to advertisers. As a user of social media I’ve personally done everything I possibly can to ensure I don’t get any ads at all or the least possible on anything I use because I grew up in the era of pop-ups and in your face advertising where you were bombarded with that shit the moment you turned on your computer. I also studied advertising for my diploma which really just made it so much worse, as a result I’ve shut it out from my life as much as I now only allow space for things I’m specifically interested in. Otherwise I actively seek out new things through my own channels – which is all fine and dandy – but I realise how this can be a folly on my part too as I may miss out on things that are of genuine interest to me because of my narrow channel of information.

The actual scary thing I suppose about data being collected is that they’re creating a profile of me that even I don’t really understand. It’s having people you don’t know knowing more about you than you do yourself, which is really just unnerving. It makes me feel like less than a person, like I’m defined by the data they collect. It takes away from my individuality. Is this a good thing? I’d say yes. If I was a machine. In the past privacy about any or all of these things was always paramount (at least that’s the way they made it out to be). There would always be a disclaimer stating that your information would never be given out under any circumstance. Very suddenly things quickly turned into “we’ll give every single piece of your information away to the highest bidders – oh and it doesn’t matter if you signed up years ago when our policy was different, we’ll take old data too anyway because fuck you that’s why”. It’s a problem because kids don’t understand this, and frankly neither do their parents, only a handful of people in the world who really pay attention or have been exploited by it know to be aware of their presence online.

As bleak as I make my position on this out to be I’m actually pretty uncertain of the role that this ‘generation of likes’ plays. I think it’s flipping awesome that people from all over the world can share and connect with each in the way that they do. But knowing that so much more than money is being made off of data about me and my behaviors and likes and aspirations without even an affirming pat on the back [no I don’t actually want a fucking pat on the back]. This data is simply invaluable and the way it was acquired and sold is comparable to slave trade, except that people don’t know they are the slaves and that makes it just perfect for the companies who own the data as no one will ever really complain. It just seems like the greatest violation or our era.

I’ve been turned into a product being sold to other products by larger products

But hey, maybe I’m wrong about all of this, maybe this is the perfect system of distribution of knowledge and wealth the world has ever known. It doesn’t matter if we don’t get paid with money, we get the experience that social media offers. A world catered to us individually based on our metadata. You pay with personal information to use a service they provide which in turn helps bring us closer to each other and to products and services that are in line with our interests and we can stay stuck in this never ending consumerist dream world. So in a way everyone wins. Except poor people. They always lose.

Sorry about the rant. This shit just irks me.

Also I newly noticed that this blog is under the Creative Commons label. Is it me or was that not there before?

The Feeling of Being Body Part

No I didn’t misspell anything, that really is the title of our new Korsakow film. This was a collaborative project made by our awesomely Asian team comprised of

myself Ajeet Singh
the humorous Azim Iskandar
the brilliant cameraman Zijing Yang
and the charismatic Anh Vu

Who all play staring roles in this little project. Hope you have fun watching it.

Along with our collaboratively written accompanying essay on what its all about and why we did what we did and why it turned out the way it did.

There are many ways that can help us to understand what a hypervideo like the kind Korsakow provides us can do. A simple way would be the way in which we might browse a single webpage on the internet and navigate through the various links that it provides. These are usually labelled to give us an indication of what and where they link us to. What this means for a K-film is that it is a viewing experience unlike any normal linear narrative film as it allows the audience to actively engage with the film and to some degree create or derive their own meaning from it. As for the title of our film, we initially named it as ‘The Feeling of Being” however as our cameraman and editor saved the folder under the more utilitarian name “Body Part” we jokingly put the two together to form the name that we thought was humorously in line with the content of the film itself and decided that it actually worked and so we stuck with it. In order to describe our film  better it’s important to discuss a little on the process of creation behind it.

The way we make meaning in a film is more often than not from the editing that combines various clips together, and with a standard narrative this editing process is done before hand and in an order suited to the filmmaker. The complete film does not deviate from its set path and that is what makes it a linear narrative.Using Korsakow with its complex and seemingly random connections, it seemed like an interesting approach that could be taken to portray and explore the human body and its various verities. When we took to writing and elaborating further on the types of clips we wanted to capture, there were various things that we had to consider as the human body encompassed a very large field of possible observation, and 60 clips would probably not be able to do it full justice. Another concern we faced was whether or not or to what extent we would include intimate human interactions with each other and whether this was something we would be comfortable with getting footage of. Whilst this would have proven to been a much more compelling piece, the general consensus was to stick to a more family friendly piece. In our very drafting of the idea, we wanted to show how we used our body parts in everyday life, especially in showing love and affection to people we love for instance kissing and touching. Our body parts are an important and pivotal way for us to interact with the world and people around us and we use them and various fascinating ways.

It’s difficult to really consider the way a narrative functions within something like a K-film as a narrative is defined as a sequence of events that tries to tell us a bigger story, and since with a K-film the narrative is different on every viewing, it could distort as well as change the story that the audience takes away from it every single time. It’s almost like a story generator. However the nature of our film, and another one of the things that K-films can do, is create a greater sense of a theme or emotion rather than a linear narrative. As a K-film can have no real ending and the audience is only given thumbnails from which to analyse and decide where to go next, the possible narratives are immense and would take unreasonable amounts of time for any one person to successfully attempt to view all the various forms or orders it could manifest into.

One of the other things we concluded on earlier in the planning and shooting stages was to either have a narrator romantically speaking in the background over the whole K-film about the human body, or to have a mini-narrative within each clip. However as we accumulated our first set of clips before being presented to our class, we noticed the humorous nature of our banter and behavior that was caught in the filming process whilst filming and in our first prototype we realised that this made it quite an enjoyable experience as the user is exploring through the various clips. We filmed a number spontaneous and impromptu clips that we felt were necessary on moulding our K-film into what it is we wished to express.We formed a table of content with a strategic plan of what to shoot, and to get roughly equal parts of each category of the body we had set up which were the ears, mouth, eyes, nose and skin. When it came to the subsequent shooting sessions we found that in order to suit our new direction we had to reform all our ideas to better suit this light hearted and humorous take on things and what resulted was a very organic set of clips that were a mix between shots that we had planned and shots that we came up with impromptu. The captivating commentaries and behavior we made whilst filming were incorporated to add to this “raw” filming trait that we had picked up in the process of filming. It also makes the viewing experience of this non-linear narrative more varied and enjoyable.

We only used 4 subjects to capture our footage, and at first we thought of getting more but we decided to stick to the 4 to maintain that sense of exploration and being able to traverse a range of emotive expressions rather than schizophrenically bouncing off random emotions from random individuals. Not all clips conveyed a deeper emotional agenda but all were supposed to give off a certain mood, this was emphasised particularly in the depth of our extreme close ups and with the post film use of black and white and film grain to give everything a deep intrinsically raw emotiveness. The k-film were just a series of clips of people in extreme close up. We aimed to go through the human body by starting up with the head and working downwards so the film always starts out with the eyes, however due to the evolving nature of our film this plan didn’t really stick for long as our K-film turned into a clip about how humans communicate with each other and express themselves.

Within the film itself initially we can see that it is completely insane and has no real connection with itself apart from the same four people who may not all necessarily even show up on some viewings and appears to be just a series of clips of them rambling about and complaining about trying to make a K-film. In a way it turns into a documentation of the 4 subjects, with each viewing we get a better understanding of their demeanours, behaviors and attitudes which are the actual observable patterns.

We chose the interface based on how it presented our clips and we were striving for a very simplistic look. we felt as if the thumbnails had more than enough information to give the audience a better sense of which direction they want to take the K-film. We were contemplating on having descriptive text alongside the clips to put some context into what they were about but that would have distorted and interrupted the flow of the film design we have carefully cultured. The end result is a single viewing clip on the left hand side of the page with three smaller thumbnails all neatly arranged on the right with frozen thumbnails of the clips they depict. We decided to have them as still images because we didn’t want the viewer to catch a preview of the following clips, as it creates a greater sense of discovery.

 What made this viewing particularly interesting was how it turned out to be very meta in that we all made it clearly obvious we were being filmed for the purpose of making a K-film and used that as a major part of the finished product. As K-films are a relatively new phenomenon and there is no real ‘correct’ way to use it, this original attempt at creating something that turned into something more impromptu and experimental yielded some pretty entertaining results. And even though we appeared to have somewhat deviated from our original course of action, our end result brought us back to our somewhat core meaning of human interactions with each other and the world around them.

 

Bibliography:

(Sawhney et. al. 1996, p. 8)
Sawhney, N, Balcom, D & Smith, I 1996, ‘HyperCafe: Narrative and Aesthetic Properties of Hypervideo’, in Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Hypertext, Hypertext ’96 (New York, NY, USA: ACM), pp. 1-10.

(Miles 2008)
Miles, A 2008, ‘Softvideography: Digital Video as Postliterate Practice.’ Small Tech: The Culture of Digital Tools, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 10-21.

 

Interjections

Technology changes much of the dynamics of our world, it evolves pretty much like any other aspect of life, and adapts and changes according to the times, so just when things seem just about set in stone, someone comes along with a giant fuckin bulldozer and shatters it all to pieces to build something new in its place. Its funny when you see that this has been one of the more consistent things in life, that when change actually does come everyone just loses their shit. Probably because there are many

Real Life Stories

So in Mondays lecture a cute little debate sprung up after Adrian mentioned that our lives are not stories, and someone in class begged to differ.

Stories need a narrator and without one there is no one to tell the story, and this was a strongly emphasised point. The way I see it though, the characters in a story aren’t aware of the presence of a narrator, so I don’t know, it just seemed a little speculative to say that there is no narrator our lives simply because we can’t observe one, but I suppose it’s not exactly the sanest thing to suggest that there is something there that isn’t, and there are accounts in stories where characters may question the presence of such a controlling force. Maybe our entire existence is being held together by some grand narrator that we’ll never know, maybe it isn’t, maybe we’ll never know. Its hard to avoid sounding as though I’m talking about a God type existence narrating us, and although I’m not excluding it as an option as sometimes narrators are described as having a Godlike presence or role in a story, just bear in mind that there are various other types of narration.

Back to Basics

Reading about narratives and stories was one of the reasons I took up a course in media, I was fascinated with the art of storytelling, and the media is all about telling people stories to engage and captivate them – and in today’s world – to motive them to buy buy buy! I took up a diploma in advertising in hopes to learn how to manipulate the minds of people and have them do my bidding, but over time I found that it wasn’t actually that difficult for a motivated individual or group to easily mislead and misdirect or have some form of control over masses of people, all you needed to do was tell them a convincing enough story and they’d fall into place relatively easily.

Don’t give yourselves to these machine men! Give yourself to democracy instead!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pK2WJd5bXFg

Oh dear, I think I failed to see the difference.

Obviously this isn’t the case all the time, and in the events where control is being lost a war tends to break out. I mean who can blame them, you find that your family, friends and general public are living at the cost of the benefit of a few, it can be pretty infuriating.

Anyway, it wasn’t long before I lost track of why I found stories and narratives interesting at all, they just became tools used purely for the benefit of a few people. I forgot the mysticism of stories, and how captivating they can be, how a good story teller could fully immerse you in an imaginary world and how it made me want to create my own worlds. Having to dissect stories and look into them so analytically like I did in Cinema Studies did me no favours, it only just made them more predictable and almost repulsive.

 

In our tutorial for class I ended up bringing to question what a situation Bowfinger the movie would be considered as; if you don’t already know it the film Bowfinger is about a movie director who attempts to make a film with a star who doesn’t know he’s in it, and apparently is based on 1927 Russian film maker covertly shot footage of the vacationing Mary Pickford, and fashioned an entire film around the footage, creating the illusion that Pickford was actually starring in this Russian film <Link to Article> My question was, does this kind of thing count as a documentary or a film? When does a film stop being a film and start being a documentary and vice versa? Then someone in class brought up how in the lecture we talked about taxonomies and classifications of things and we discussed how its not quite so straightforward to categorize documentaries like that and that it was futile to bother with definitions, as definitions are easily disputed, which I found funny because it kind of defeats the purpose of the definition of definition. But I suppose thats debatable – or not? before I start going in cir—– Aaaaaaanyway the point was not to pick the style you intend to create with and cater to fit those categories, rather, decide what you want your story to do and then figure out what the tools you have can do to achieve it. This made me wonder why we have the categories at all then, just when we think we have it all figured out, something comes along and tears it all to pieces and we have to start building new systems to understand them all over again. Is it futile or absolutely necessary, or does it not matter either way and we should know them all whilst knowing they can’t fulfil the function they were created for? I’ll tell you this though, it makes me confused and want to laugh at the same time.

Weekly Video Post (Week6)

I missed out on week 2 but I’ll have em up here soon, I’m not so sure how to go about posting these, maybe I’ll keep editing this particular post and adding to it instead of creating a new post every week for 3 videos that people outside of this subject just wont understand.

Anyway this is the Light and Dark post, I’m missing a third video for some reason it didn’t post up on vine but I’ll fix that later.

https://vine.co/v/MhJ3bamOpZ5

https://vine.co/v/MhJ3VJMlVhn

Week 6

https://vine.co/v/M5ZA5xtlLuE

Never trust anything that can think for itself

 

“Never trust anything that can think for itself, if you can’t see where it keeps its brain.”― J.K. RowlingHarry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets

So the people at MIT have gone and done something ‘that can’t be done’  -as we humans normally do- with these little robots that can assemble themselves.

These things are pretty incredible, well maybe not so easily observed in their demonstration, but the potential they posses is… intimidating to say the least. I mean, being able to change shape according to the situation?

But on the other hand could it help bring us one step closer to realising the Nanosuit from Crysis?

Although it probably already exists, in some secret lab, somewhere, maybe beneath my house. There’s probably a guy in the suit watching me type this right noaawefjapgj