Flip Lecture & Weekly Reading (Week 4)

222787512786601514_24kwOZNF_f

Trusting Strangers For The Better Good.

Have you ever watched those feel good videos on YouTube on a lazy Sunday afternoon with a cup of tea and a side of biscuits? Well, I have. I’m talking about those random acts of kindness videos where some random guy gives flowers to mothers on the street walk or pranks that make you laugh or smile. Growing up and identifying myself as a cis-female, I have trust issues with strangers, and obviously it’s common that most people do. You don’t know if they’re serial killers, stalkers or some clingy creep that just wants to talk to so they can stare at your beloved assets. How can you differentiate the good apples from the bad?

How can you give your complete trust to someone that may change your future, no matter how long or short that future may be, that can mean a day, a week or a month or even more? In the 2009 documentary Us Now directed by Ivo Gormley, explores the possibilities of humankind using social media as a form of resource to connect to other people and learning from them in the process. There is an evergreen of knowledge that society as a whole have, so why not share it?

 People are ‘connecting on the basis of relevant similarities’ (MT Rainey 2009), as social media advance through the years. ‘Connecting on the basis of relevant similarities’ (MT Rainey 2009), sounds like the blurb for dating applications doesn’t it? Us Now investigates the notion of being more involve in communities, and in society in general. Sometimes, people ‘need help from a friendly stranger’ (MT Rainey 2009) when they are either lost or feel uncertain about something.

There are people out there who are willing to help out those in need and when I say ‘help’, I don’t mean by giving money to those mental health organisations, donating to those poverty stricken kids in Africa or volunteering at the homeless shelter. I mean helping those in need, those people who need help right there and right then. It’s help that’s manageable and cost-effective for you, ‘its quite nice to give someone directions for example or by imparting a bit of your knowledge’ (Mikey Winkove 2009). In return of helping people, they feel good about themselves, making them feel all warm and fuzzy.

pay-it-forward-2014-random-act-of-kindnessFreedom and control’ (pp. 37) can be a couple of reasons why we use social media. Social media allows us to voice our opinions, there’s a reason why anyone who works in advertising says the most powerful tool is the word of mouth of others, ‘we have a mass-consumer technology that supports this and we’re only now beginning to discover what we can do with it’ (Lee Bryant 2009). There’s a reason why there are reviews on everything from books, iTunes applications and technological products, ‘the web can create large communities of informal knowledge and system ties it to make it very useful’ (Charles Leadbeater 2009). Trusting people to network on a peer-to-peer basis of helping one another using social media is still relatively new, people are using ‘social media to bring the gift economy out in the open’ (Sofia Parker 2009).

There is a growing number of online services, websites and applications that allows a person to help others, ‘once you deliver something that actually allows people to make a decision, it’s incredible how compelling it is how people are to participate’ (Saul Albert 2009), Us Now examines how the internet has become a playground for adults to gain and pass on knowledge to one another by participating in an online – and at times, offline – community. Whether that might be a couchsurfing community, a website about motherhood or a soccer team, attention is given to those who feel they need to participate in an event, comment or feel the need to inform others of a place or product. And it appears that the opinion of the majority rules.

References:

Banyak Films 2009, Us Now, video recording, viewed 5 August 2014, <http://vimeo.com/4489849>.

Hinton S & Hjorth L 2013, ‘What is Web 2.0?’, Understanding Contemporary Culture Series: Understanding Social Media, London, 31 July 2014, SAGE Publications Ltd, pp. 37.

Weekly Reading (Week 3)

imagesThere is a growing trend of people using crowdfunding platforms such as Pozible or Kickstarter to crowd source thus crowd fund their projects and using social media outlets such as Facebook to promote their endeavours. There have been a number of artists, bands and filmmakers requesting funding for the recording and production cost of their music video clips, CD’s, and films. Australian artist Butterfly Boucher, the Australian band Eskimo Joe and the American film Veronica Mars (2014) have all sought funding from the public to create their media project. As a reward for assisting the project, people will receive something beneficial to them, for example, a signed copy of the proposed music album or an exclusive film screening. The participation from the public and potential audience is required if people trust and engage themselves in these musicals and filmmakers pursuits (pp. 75). One has to ask how genuine are these people who are pitching these ideas in respects to asking help from the average person to fund their fastidious venture.

Reference:

Hinton S & Hjorth L 2013, ‘What is Web 2.0?’, Understanding Contemporary Culture Series: Understanding Social Media, London, 31 July 2014, SAGE Publications Ltd, pp. 55-76.

Weekly Reading (Week 2)

freedom‘Freedom and control’ (pp. 37) can be a couple of reasons why we use social media. If we can, we would all like to be in control and be free to do whatever we like all day and everyday throughout our lifetime. This may not be the case due to work and family life commitments, and for some, other limitations may be not having the monetary capacity to fund such extravagant indulges.

 Instead, we live our life – and sometimes through the lives of others – online. Our online life connects us to other people who are not with us at this current moment as we are huddled under a mountain of blankets in our cold, dark rooms, as well as people from diverse backgrounds and from a mixture of cultures that have may have unusual morals and values than you. Their perspective on life may alter the way we think about the world, certain types of people and situations such as the Arab Spring and the war on terrorism.

 Freedom-of-Speech-freedom-of-speech-19188413-510-352

We call have a voice online, the freedom of speech, we can say all the nonsense that we can’t say to people in our daily lives or in public as people may get heat up by our slurs and take offence of our public nuisance (pp. 31), and next thing you know, you’re in court for saying the very thing you could of said online and no one would have give a damn as you would just be perceived as a “troll”. Funny that.

 I am very surprised at the level of tracking used against all of social media users. Did we agree to the ‘‘terms and conditions’’ when we logged in on Facebook to be tracked? I fathom, that is the contract when you log in, that is, you allow Facebook to track what you like, the time of day/night you view your Facebook account. And what you do on that service provider, whether that be stalking your old mates from high school or checking out that hot chick that you grew fond after seeing her at a mutual friend’s birthday party or maybe you’re more interested in that new band’s song that you kept hearing on Fox FM or maybe you are just innocently connecting with other people by chatting them up. Who knows what you do, but you, or is it?

So, the question I pose is that, do we allow such third parties know who we are? You know, whether we are either male or female or in-between, where we’re from, the sort of music we like, or the friends we are friends with. Are we so blind to the fact of what the implication of those two mere words, “I agree”, actually means when we click on the button to allow third parties to receive information about us and/or receive information from them? Are our little minds capable of understanding the influences of such clever marketing techniques? These third parties or even a service provider such as Facebook collect our data so much so that the cooperation can use our data against us by exploiting our online personalities and what we ‘like’, or maybe Facebook will suggest to you to add these “people you may know” since you share a mutual friend with that particular person (pp. 32-33).

We may think that we have the freedom and control over our social media use (pp. 31), but do we actually do? Are we aiming to find fulfilment and satisfaction through our online life by using digital tools such as Facebook and Instagram, is it to equip us from the disappointment in our lives that we are unable to achieve our own desire? For example, whereas others may travel to Alaska and witness the Northern Lights, we live our dreams by viewing their selfies with a pillowy string of green and blue splash across the night sky in the background. That, we only know ourselves, and soon, the media service you use, will too.

 Whatever your reason may be for going online, keep one eye open and pray that the next Kim Kardashian news isn’t in your news feed on Facebook.

 

Reference:

Hinton S & Hjorth L 2013, ‘What is Web 2.0?’, Understanding Contemporary Culture Series: Understanding Social Media, London, 31 July 2014, SAGE Publications Ltd, pp. 14-38.