Pomodoro Technique

pomodoro1

In the studio today, Adrian introduce a writing technique called the Pomodoro technique. The Pomodoro technique is where you put all your concentration into a writing piece for a total of 25 minutes and then you take a five minute break. After a 25 minute of what I would call an intense period of writing, I discovered this writing technique is indeed useful. I will be using this technique for the during of my studies at RMIT.

nov13_4

I wrote these paragraphs in class today as part of the the script that will accompany my short film:

‘Since I’m one of the Queer Officers in the Queer Department for the RMIT University Student Union (RUSU), I plan to use my final media product as a means to promote not only the department that I am in charge of but also to promote a sense of belonging and worthiness in the safe space that the Queer Lounge at the RMIT city campus provides. This safe place that queer students have on a campus in a city that’s vibrant as Melbourne is privilege. A privilege that some queer students take for granted such as when they drink their morning coffee or eat their evening meal, they leave rubbish and their dirty dishes in the kitchen sink, to my dismay, for I am the one who has to clean up after them. There are various posters about cleaning up in the lounge, nonetheless these are to be ignored. The students must have such a busy schedule that they were able to exploit the property of RUSU, yet be lazy enough to wash their dishes.

Fluid as it is, sexuality and gender identity implores the notion that visibility is vulnerability, that is being visible as a queer individual in society is to be vulnerable, as there is a likelihood that they are can be more vulnerable to hate crimes, discrimination, and homophobic quips, especially so if they are an effeminate gay man, a butch lesbian or transgendered person.

By referencing a quote in Claire Colebrook’s article Queer Aesthetics:

‘Would it be possible to assert simply that one is: that I am the being who I am and have always been; that I do not expect or hope to change? Or, would it be possible—this time not referring to oneself—to a world or nature that is fully actualized and that bears neither a potentiality for change nor a tendency to change in ways that are not determined in advance by some norm?’ (pp. 26).

I will be exploring the various aspects of sexual orientation and gender identity, the challenges of coming out and determining the role in which society plays in the wellbeing of a queer individual in my final essay and in final work for this course. I aim to raise awareness and the plight of LGBT+ individuals and allow my audience to see a new perspective of what it means to identify as a queer individual.

I really like the part of the quote where it says ‘I am the being who I am and have always been; that I do not expect or hope to change?’. I would like to explore this short, little snippet rather that the entire quote. The entire quote itself to me seems quote complex, there are many parts to the quote that I feel will need addressing and I believe that in simplifying this quote, that’s a higher chance that I will be able to focus on sexual orientation and gender identity, or at least I hope.

Honestly, I have written more than a thousand words based on this snippet of the entire quote over the weekend, in my one of my blog posts recently, I noted that I plan to focus on various topics of the queer identity and queer issues such as coming out, religion, mental health, etc. I have followed through and as of now my essay is all over the place since there are random paragraphs in relations to the topics. Obviously, there will be a dire need to research to back up my essay.

Speaking of research, I came by this word a couple of days ago, this word is ‘sissyphobia’ and the definition of the word is something along the line of a person – most likely a cis-gendered masculine male – who is afraid or have a distinct dislike or even hatred of the more feminine male, that is, the effeminate gay man. Similar to homophobia, where homophobes do not agree on the life that queers lead, sissyphobia is where gay men dislike being with the more feminine man. What intrigued me was that this term is totally new to me, to be frank, I didn’t even know this word existed, but then again, there are plenty of words out there that I don’t know of that I know exist. I found four peer-reviewed articles on this term ‘sissyphobia’. So far, I only read the abstract of each article and even so, I found it quite informative and I plan to use one or more of these articles in my essay.

I’m intrigued by the idea that some gay masculine men view effeminate gay men as submissive and “weak”, why is there this creation of inequality? Is it even possible for effeminate gay men to be as equal as their more masculine peers, both inside the bedroom and out?

In the LGBT+ community there are many, many terms in describing each queer person. Many people have told me how they dislike this idea in being categorise, it makes them feel like cattle, one of those animals that you need to have this clear description of them in order to understand them, that their being, their representation of who are they as a person is undermine in other queer person’s view of them. Often they identify as non-binary, which is fair enough, since this world we live is so patriarchal, misogynic and discriminative of those who are not unlike them.

In the gay community, just like in the lesbian community, there are many terms in describing a gay man’s physical appearance, their personality and their mannerism – such “bears” and “twinks”. In the lesbian world, these opposites are clearly defined by “butches” and “femmes”.

I would like to explore the notion of mannerism. In reading one of the abstract of the sissyphobia articles, I’ve made the realisation that mannerism can be a topic that I am able to explore. For example, why is it that butch lesbians are categorise as a masculine with male traits and why are femme lesbian categorise as feminine with female traits: even though femme lesbians identify as cis-gendered females – though there are some males to females (MTF) transgendered people that identify as femme lesbians.

Mannerism is what make the queer community go round, I for one, believe this to be true, in my three years of coming to terms with myself, it appears that it all comes down to mannerisms, that’s what people in your community would classify you as. It’s rather sad actually, as if you are nothing more than a label. Yes, labels! Why is it that in the queer community we like to label each other? Yet, heterosexuals label us? Why do we do it to each other? The notion of stereotypes in the queer community is rife.

In one of the articles about sissyphobia, the author noted that some gay masculine men dislike men with feminine characteristics because they feel threatened by them, that it is through their own insecurity of effeminate gay men, even of gay dating/hook up mobile applications such as Grindlr.’

What have I learnt so far in Studio 5

Lists. Who knew lists would be so complicated. In attempting to complete my first task during the week, the Project One assessment task, that was to be presented in class today, I realised how tough it was to come up and brainstorm a central idea and/or thing. I decided to use the Apple iPhone applications as an artefact in completing my Project One task. I thought there was going to be many things to write about it, there’s so much history behind the Apple iPhone applications even though it’s only been these couple of decades that the Apple iPhone applications have hit it off and gotten popular over the years. What I didn’t realised was that I had gotten myself in a bit of a pickle, I had so much to write that my brain began to go numb over the thought of coming up with ideas that could range from the moon and sun to back down to Earth. Seriously. How silly of me to pick an artefact thinking it was going to be easy to write about for my assessment task.

I realised that this course, this Documentary Ontography course is not simply about lists, it’s about how you link random words, phrases and sentences together for it to make sense. Sure it can be a bunch of random words on a piece of paper, but how is that going to make sense if there’s no one central idea. Just the other day, Adrian asked the class, ‘what irritates you?’. It was a simple question and we were asked to write down what irritated us in the form of a list. Everyone had different things to say about what irritated them, from sounds, to smell, and the the feeling of something. My list was simple, I just wrote about people and how people can be so irritating. I learnt that even though everyone comes from a different background, we all have different ideas of what irritate us.

Generation (X/Y) Like This

6a00d8341c82c653ef019aff113ff0970b

It’s Week 2 already!! Fast ain’t it? One week it’s orientation week, then, the week after. Actual work to be done.

Weeeeeeeeek 2 of the Integrated Media 2 lecture was a ‘flip lecture’, so what that means, and I may be paraphrasing here, is that you can stay home and ‘listen’ to the lecture. That is, this week, the flip lecture was a TV show program called Four Corners that’s on the TV station ABC, the title of the episode is Generation Like.

The blurb for the episode of Four Corners:  ‘How advertisers and big commercial brands are exploiting teenagers using social media – and making big dollars in the process’, (ABC 2014).

Click on the following link to view the episode: http://iview.abc.net.au/programs/four-corners/NC1404H025S00#playing

Generation Like explores social media use amongst Generations X and Y and their obsession with attaining ‘likes’ from their friends/fans/audience.

Questions meet Answers: answers meet questions…

How does this documentary alter your understanding of the way you use social media?

It is rather unnerving to know that my information is being gathered by third parties as I use social media, whether it be, YouTube, Instagram or Facebook. As I ‘share’ or ‘like’ or ‘comment’ on any content on social media, to know that my data is being collected by social media network analyst is not a very great feeling. To know that my information, my data, my PERSONAL information and PERSONAL data is being used against me, to know that I’m being targeted by these that social media outlets just amazes me (and not in a good way).

Facebook, Instagram and YouTube are all free services to use by the general public, I understand that in order to earn a reputable capital for the usage of these media outlets,  Facebook, Instagram and YouTube uses a wide range of advertising techniques, the sneakier it is, the better, they would say.

What connections can you make with the role of a Social Media Producer?

Facebook, Instagram and YouTube for example is a fantastic starting point to become a social media producer, as if you post something online, the content you post automatically makes you a social media producer. Funny that eh? In becoming a social media producer, you are capable of “brainwashing” and influencing eager, young minds, to the best of your benefit. The obsession with obtaining ‘likes’ with these social media producers can be what I call an epidemic. How so? It is because we are all guilty of posting or say, share a piece of content that we see fitting to our personality, our career, etc. etc. It is because we want to be heard. It’s natural to feel this way. As humans, we crave the attention of others and in this context, in a way, a social media producer can decipher what they seem fit in a world that seems to be missing something, if that even makes sense. In todays’ social media landscape, being a social media producer means that you capable of making millions of dollars from doing what you love, from doing what you enjoy. For example, Lauren Curtis and Michelle Pham have made a name for themselves on YouTube by posting videos of make-up tutorials and making who knows how much $$$$$ from it.

The association with a ‘star’ on social media and a brand in this context means recognition and recognition means money. It’s cheap marketing, or so it is said (by who I don’t particularly know). Even though when the ‘star’s’ audience acknowledges that they are being marketed towards, what makes them continue to watch, ‘follow’, ‘subscribe’, ‘like’ or ‘comment’, ‘heart’ or ‘share’ that content? Social media producers are very open to the possibilities to the global market in which their Facebook or Instagram post or videos may give them and those social media producers very much so crave exposure to a large audience in the online space.

What ideas does this documentary raise in regards to the event your group is planning and the task of achieving participatory engagement?

Exploit the audience aka passerby’s time as much as possible I suppose. Time. Time. Time. We are all often lacking in it. Social media producers tend to make sure that the content that they make is worth viewing, and in viewing the content, the audience may be asked to become an active viewer and ‘like’, ‘share’, or ‘comment’ their media product. My group and I are aiming to obtain as much participatory engagement from the general public as much as possible. The odds may be against us, but we can hope. Right?

Look Up

look-up-from-your-phone-videomaxresdefault

The YouTube short film ‘Look Up’ went viral on the internet since it was first published on April 25th 2014, so far gaining around 32 million views online.

Why?

Because the film explores the artefact of a mobile phone.

The films makes an implication that we are all slaves to our own creative innovations. That, we’ve become zombies obsess with technology and social media and the way it connects us people. The film also explores how we are anti-social when we are surrounded by people, which may lead to the loneliness we feel deep within while we are connecting with other people.

TED Talk: Bring On The Learning Evolution

Bring on the learning evolution

Bring on the learning evolution

The speaker of the TED Talk guest is Ken Robinson and he explores the learning evolution in education, arguing that we are living organic lives. Robinson suggests that schools and colleges must cultivate students creativity for the future.

Robison discusses the idea of linearity in his speech, making the statement the following statement:

‘Life is not linear , its organic. We create our lives semiotically as we explore our talents in relations to the circumstances they help to create for us. But you know, we are become more obsess with this linear narrative, and probably the pinnacle of this is getting you an education at college.’

We know the routine of our daily lives, that the rhythm of our lives are not dictated by linearity and expectations but by spontaneity.

Robinson’s statement somewhat relates to our Korsakow films, that is, that we don’t know what we are going to watch or when we do. What we do know however, is the emerging pattern of the evolution of a Korsakow film as we actively immerse ourselves by watching it. For example, if a Korkakow film is based on the pattern of ‘lists’, as we engage ourselves in the interactive documentary, we can begin to get a sense of what the filmmaker is trying to show us. Such as, if the Korsakow film was about a list of farm animals, viewers will be watching clip-lets of animals feeding in barnyards and playing in mud, etc.

This TED Talk was incredibly engaging to watch. Robinson speaks plain English, making the video more understandable, sometimes, I do have trouble understanding what speakers are talking about. His charisma enthrals his audience, making them laugh with his honest small jokes, maybe it’s mainly because his pure British accent. To me, it’s all about his charm that makes the video effortless to watch.

So far, the video has been watched by a total of around 4,853,000 people from around the world.

Click on the link below, Robinson is worth a watch.

http://www.ted.com/talks/sir_ken_robinson_bring_on_the_revolution?utm_medium=on.ted.com-facebook-share&utm_campaign=&utm_source=facebook.com&awesm=on.ted.com_g0D9g&utm_content=awesm-publisher#t-557238

Sinking the Ship

Image

Lately, I’ve been a bit consumed by TED Talk videos. Recently, I’ve watched a TED Talk with James Cameron as the speaker, he talks about his life experience both as a scuba diver and a filmmaker. As a child growing up, he loved exploring the great outdoors and drawing up strange creatures inspired by all the science fiction books he read. He had aspired to be a scuba diver as a teenager, but managed to be a world-renown director as an adult. His curiosities with the ocean have always fascinated Cameron. Using his wild imagination, he fantasized and managed to create and built his films through his vision, this is evident in Cameron’s blockbuster films such as Avatar and Titanic. To Cameron, science fiction is a form of escape. Cameron makes the impossible, possible. The thrill of constructing an entirely whole new world, a world that no one has seen before, pushing the limits of human creativity. 

Just like Korsakow, we are constantly pushing ourselves to be creative on the simple platform. Cameron notes that anyone can create anything out of their imagination, it’s all about how we go forth and see whether we use our imagination as a stepping stone to build something. The possibilities of lists in Korsarkow may be poetic and infinite, it’s about how comply with patterns and narratives that makes our K-Films interesting and create purpose.