0

week 11: some questions to reflect on

In last week’s Thursday class I introduced some ideas from some theorists who think about the world as precarious, changing and indeterminate. What I would like you to think about as you draw closer to the end of task four is how your way of noticing might allow you to see some of the complexities of the world. This is the final aim of the studio so it’s important for you to reflect on this on your blogs.

Here are some questions which we’ll talk about in today’s class that might give you some direction:

How might your project evolve in concert with the dynamic environment around you? (Gibson, Changescapes)

What do you think “patchy landscapes,” “multiple temporalities” and “shifting assemblages of humans and nonhumans” might mean? (Tsing, Mushroom at the End of the World)

Does what you’re doing for task four allow you to look around rather than ahead? (Tsing, Mushroom at the End of the World)

Will your task four allow you notice neglected things? What do you think they might be? (Tsing, Mushroom at the End of the World)

If your task four, is about inhabiting a space or noticing in a particular environment, what are the particular qualities of that environment you come to be aware of through simply being there? (Stewart, Atmospheric Attunements)

What will you be tuning into through the making of your project? (Pickering, The Mangle of Practice)

If you tune into something unexpected does your project have the flexibility to adjust? (Pickering, The Mangle of Practice)

0

Week 10 – what do your projects allow you to do…

In today’s Thursday workshop we talked about the relationship the projects we are making might have with the world. Here are some slides which reference what we talked about. The main thing to be thinking about is if the world is messy, indeterminate, precarious and entangled how do these ways of noticing better attend to this world? This should be a question that you ask yourselves and explore on your blog.

This question reflects the final aim of the studio which is:

to create media artefacts which come closer to performing the complexity of the changing world around us.

To think about this try not attributing a meaning to your work but leaving it open for someone to experience, sense or embody. The media you make might allow someone to sense and notice new things in the world around them that far exceed meaning.

While there are no readings from week 10-12, here is a list of readings that you might want to consider to think about the relationship between what you’re making and the world:

Gibson, Ross. “Changescapes – An Introduction.” Changescapes: Complexity, Mutability, Aesthetics. UWA Publishing, 2015. Pp. 1-20.

Miles, Adrian. The Gentleness of the Comma and the Violence of Story. Adrian Miles – Academia.edu, 2017, https://www.academia.edu/19067331/The_Gentleness_of_the_Comma_and_the_Violence_of_Story.

Pickering, Andrew. “The Mangle of Practice” The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. University of Chicago Press, 1995. Pp. 1-27.

Stewart, Kathleen. “Atmospheric Attunements.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 29, no. 3, 2011, pp. 445–453.

Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. “Arts of Noticing.” The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. 2015. Pp. 11-26.

Most of these are available at the RMIT library or via the links provided. I will make a photocopy of Changescapes for you shortly.

Skip to toolbar