This seems to be becoming table tennis.
The next iteration of the introductory paragraph I’ve been asked to comment on:
In the novel ‘Alien Phenomenology,’ Ian Bogost discusses how lists of objects that lack ‘explication’ can draw ‘greater attentiveness’ towards them. Bogost explains how people naturally want to ‘join the dots’ and create relationships between things. When objects are stated on a list, they don’t have the narrative structure of a sentence. Lists do not provide explanation and therefore encourage more ways to join and relate things to each other. When objects in lists lack description, they let the audience question how they might be related and how they might join. This in turn can make the audience more attentive as it requires a deeper level of understanding. Bogost also talks about how lists that are ‘disjointed’ and illogical can ‘excite viewers’ as they have to put more effort into understanding them. In order to test out Bogosts discussions about lists, a one minute soundscape was created for the locale ‘by water.’ The soundscape includes a non-narrative list about the Merri Creek with ambient sounds (recorded at the location) in the background. Specific individual parts of the Meri Creek where included in the listing. Words such as ‘hydrogen’, ‘pollution’, and ‘bubble’ where included in the soundscapes list to try to draw attention to the locale without actually describing it in narrative form.
We will need to work on this in the studio, won’t we?
- It is not a novel
- perhaps “stated as a list”
- Still not sure how you get from lack of description, questions about relations, therefore requires greater understanding. Because implicit in there is something about understanding of something, but what? (figure that out and things here might make more sense)
- suggest Bogost isn’t discussing but is making claims/arguments about lists
- Merri, not Meri
much better. Now go on and do the rest. (You can’t tell if this is ‘right’ until you have the rest. I can’t stress and make plain enough how important this is.)
What, Again?
This seems to be becoming table tennis.
The next iteration of the introductory paragraph I’ve been asked to comment on:
We will need to work on this in the studio, won’t we?
much better. Now go on and do the rest. (You can’t tell if this is ‘right’ until you have the rest. I can’t stress and make plain enough how important this is.)
Related
Adrian Miles
Adrian Miles is a Senior Lecturer in New Media and currently the Program Director of the Bachelor of Media and Communication Honours research studio at RMIT, in Melbourne, Australia. He has also been a senior new media researcher in the InterMedia Lab at the University of Bergen, Norway. His academic research on hypertext and networked interactive video has been widely published and his applied digital projects have been exhibited internationally. Adrian's research interests include hypertext and hypermedia, appropriate pedagogies for new media education, digital video poetics, and the use of Deleuzean philosophy in the context of digital poetics. He was the first or second person in the world to videoblog.
March 29, 2017
Commentary
writing